Marin Cilic vs Arthur Rinderknech Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Sep at 07:01 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Cilic vs A. Rinderknech

CRO
1
Win
Played
2
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Cilic 1 - 2 Rinderknech
They have played 8 sets in total, with Marin Cilic winning 4 and Arthur Rinderknech winning 4. The last match between Arthur Rinderknech and Marin Cilic was at the Davis Cup, World Group, Q2, CRO-FRA 1-3, 12-09-2025, Round: Rubber 2, Surface: Clay, with Arthur Rinderknech getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cilic | 1 |
| Rinderknech | 2 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(Rubber 2) Davis Cup, World Group, Q2, CRO-FRA 1-3(09-12-25)
(R1) Swiss Indoors Basel - Basel(10-24-22)
(R1) French Open - Paris(05-31-21)
M. Cilic vs A. Rinderknech H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $23,262,625 | Career Prize Money | $3,224,935 |
| 64.09% (712-399) | Career Total W/L | 59.15% (336-232) |
| 1 | Clay | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 27 | Titles | 11 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
| 38.10% (8-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.09% (27-28) |
M. Cilic vs A. Rinderknech Match Preview:
- How do Cilic and Rinderknech compare on second serve performance recently? Cilic has won 48.28% of points on his second serve, while Rinderknech has a slight edge, winning 48.55%.
- In return game statistics over recent months, Cilic is ahead by winning 43.29% of his opponent's second serve points compared to Rinderknech's 41.39%.
- For first serve returns, Cilic claims 23.05% of points, outpacing Rinderknech's 21.23%.
- Under pressure, Rinderknech surpasses Cilic with a 62.07% breakpoint save rate, while Cilic has managed to save 58.02%.
- Over the past year, Cilic has a higher match win percentage of 62.22%, opposed to Rinderknech's 42.86%.
- What is their best career surface? Cilic excels on grass with a 73% win rate, whereas Rinderknech performs best on indoor hard courts, winning 61% of matches.
- Considering their recent tournament levels, Cilic has excelled in lower-tier Challenger/ITF tournaments with a 75% win rate; however, Rinderknech has faced tougher main tour competition, winning 41.18% of matches.
- In their head-to-head encounters, Cilic and Rinderknech have each won once, with Cilic winning four out of the six sets played between them.
- At their last meeting in Basel on an indoor hard court, Rinderknech narrowly secured victory over Cilic.
- If this match advances to a deciding set, Cilic has a slight advantage, winning 64% of them in the past year compared to Rinderknech's 61%.
- Cilic performs slightly better in tiebreak scenarios, with each winning one against the other in their past matches.
- Rinderknech has faced higher-ranked opponents over the past year, with an average opponent rank of 90.02, while Cilic's average opponent rank was 109.42.
- In recent months, Rinderknech demonstrates greater efficiency in converting breakpoint opportunities, with a conversion rate of 27.03%, while Cilic converts at a rate of 20.67%.
Editorial Prediction (September 12, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match between Cilic and Rinderknech presents an intriguing duel, with both players showing strengths in different areas. While Cilic displays a superior winning percentage over the past year, he has competed primarily at lower-tier events, suggesting a potential discrepancy in the level of competition faced compared to Rinderknech.
Rinderknech has shown a slight edge in second serve performance and breakpoint conversions, both critical in tight matches. His ability to perform under pressure, saving a higher percentage of breakpoints, could be a deciding factor.
Additionally, Cilic's proficiency on grass may not translate into an advantage unless the upcoming match is played on his preferred surface. The head-to-head history indicates tight competition, with each player having claimed a victory against the other.
Given Rinderknech's recent win in their last encounter and superior performance trends against higher-ranked opponents, he might have a slight advantage in this upcoming match. Therefore, Rinderknech is favored to emerge as the winner.
Marin Cilic vs Arthur Rinderknech Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Cilic vs A. Rinderknech H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 41 | Games Won | 37 |
| 20 | Aces (Total) | 21 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:34:48 | Average Match Time | 1:34:48 |
| 63% (118/187) | 1st Serve % | 67% (138/206) |
| 83% (98/118) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (93/138) |
| 46% (32/69) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (33/68) |
| 42% (8/19) | Break Pts Won % | 27% (3/11) |
| 39% (80/206) | Return Points Win % | 30% (57/187) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Cilic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 7-5 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(2) 7-6(2) | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(9) 7-5 | ||
A. Rinderknech Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-7(9) 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | ||
F | L | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
SF | W | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | ||

M. Cilic vs A. Rinderknech Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.09% (712/399) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.15% (336/232) |
| 60.59% (1776/1155) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.28% (784/609) |
| 53.52% (15440/13409) | Games Win/Loss | 52.39% (7165/6510) |
| 62.53% (252/151) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.79% (113/76) |
| 61.94% (192/118) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.20% (103/71) |
| 64.68% (174/95) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.49% (98/64) |
| 72.87% (94/35) | Grass Win/Loss | 51.16% (22/21) |
| 0.64 | Aces Per Game | 0.64 |
| 9118 | Aces Total | 4314 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 2958 | Total Double Faults | 1323 |
| 1:18:24 | Average Match Time | 1:42:22 |
| 453.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 358.34 |
| 57% (44386/78141) | 1st Serve % | 64% (24926/38905) |
| 77% (34272/44548) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (18734/24926) |
| 52% (17725/33841) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7049/13978) |
| 39% (2801/7252) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (1240/3307) |
| 38% (30391/80727) | Return Points Win % | 36% (14311/39857) |
| 70.09% (150/64) | Slam W/L | 48.72% (19/20) |
| 52.61% (131/118) | Masters W/L | 46.15% (24/28) |
| 64.29% (36/20) | Cups W/L | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 68.21% (309/144) | Main Tour W/L | 52.41% (87/79) |
| 16.67% (2/10) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 64.29% (54/30) | Challenger W/L | 63.27% (93/54) |
| 73.53% (25/9) | Futures W/L | 70.06% (110/47) |
| 62% (540/869) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (318/525) |
| 70% (165/235) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 42% (14/33) |
| 52% (269/521) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (126/260) |
| 58% (215/369) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (122/213) |
| 86% (686/587) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (314/267) |
| 14% (686/98) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (314/45) |
| 29% (425/123) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (253/66) |